Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates:

Media 

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new users

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1

  • STEP 1
    STEP 1

STEP 2

  • STEP 2
    STEP 2

STEP 3

  • STEP 3
    STEP 3

STEP 4

  • STEP 4
    STEP 4

STEP 5

  • STEP 5
    STEP 5

STEP 6

  • STEP 6
    STEP 6

STEP 7

  • STEP 7
    STEP 7

STEP 8

  • STEP 8 (last step)
    STEP 8 (last step)

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

File:Marilyn Monroe, Photoplay 1953.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 00:03:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Mosteiro dos Jerónimos 33550-Lisbon (36217737502).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 00:02:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Chouette hulotte 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 23:54:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Pez ballesta de dientes rojos (Odonus niger), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-25, DD 23.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 19:59:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Redtoothed triggerfish (Odonus niger), Anilao, Philippines

File:•light purplish blue leaf•(AESTIVUM).jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 19:01:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

High Contrast Leaf.

File:Pécheurs à Kerkennah.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 12:45:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pécheurs à Kerkennah

File:Green vegetation on the low cloud-swept relief in Hallasan National Park Jeju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 04:41:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Green vegetation on the low cloud-swept relief in Hallasan National Park Jeju South Korea

File:Woljeonggyo Bridge and stone steps on the bank at golden hour in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 04:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Woljeonggyo Bridge and stone steps on the bank at golden hour in Gyeongju South Korea

File:Percival Lowell by James E. Purdy.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 02:16:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Percival Lowell by James E. Purdy

File:Interior das aguas-4 (53249497122).jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 01:13:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A photo of a river in the city of Tutóia, Maranhão - Brazil.
I don't see the point of shooting at 1/2,000 sec using f/1.7 for landscapes in both versions, and the composition of this one does not satisfy me, but yes, the sky is slightly better. Blown hightlights in the nominated version -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin (1, 2, 3.) Does the composition of some of these photos satisfy you? I can propose an alternative. KwisatzH (talk) 05:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Horse and man are out of focus in File:Interior das aguas (53250371501).jpg because the small F-number creates a narrow depth of field. Compare with the water in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pecheurs remballant leur materiel en fin de journée.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 19:29:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pecheurs remballant leur materiel en fin de journée, fort de Tabarka en toile de fond

 I withdraw my nomination — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atef Ouni (talk • contribs)

File:Vue sur la fauchelle sur le chemin du retour.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 19:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vue sur la fauchelle sur le chemin du retour

 I withdraw my nomination — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atef Ouni (talk • contribs)

File:Nebbia su colli e monti - Foreste Casentinesi - Appennino Tosco Emiliano - GT 01 - 2024 01 28.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 17:56:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Advection fog on hills and mount - Tuscan-Romagnol Apennines.

File:Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River under the sunset.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 15:03:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alternative

File:Gallery Belgrade.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 10:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Belgrade Waterfront, view to Sava River from shoping center Galerija

File:Nottuln, Gladbeck, Grashalm -- 2024 -- 4342.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 09:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blade of grass (at a barley field) at the golden hour in the Gladbeck hamlet, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Samango monkey (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus) head Mount Sheba.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 19:41:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Samango monkey (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus)
I don't like the suggested crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helgumannen August 2020 09.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 09:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Helgumannen is a fishing station near the nature reserve of Langhammars at Fårö island (Gotland, Sweden).

File:Penutupan Para Asian Games 2018.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 05:04:08
SHORT DESCRIPTION

Commons:Featured pictures/Historical

File:GBU-38 munition explosions in Iraq.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 04:48:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

GBU-38 munitions are dropped by a American B-1B Lancer bomber onto an insurgent torture house and prison in Northern Zambraniyah, Iraq, March 10, 2008.
Yes, but atomic bomb tests killed people indirectly through radiation sickness not well understood at the time. It may not be relevant, but the nominator is a great admirer of US Armed Forces. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FPC guidelines: "The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensation" -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And the vote takes into account the context of the observer. Given that the nominator is a great admirer of the US Armes Forces, I don't really think that he wants to evoke rejection or sadness through his image. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Having a user on Commons who has a special interest in military matters is useful. That means he can dig through piles of such images for the best ones and nominate them here, and we don't need to see all those depressing images. --Cart (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator is not the photographer. All the countries of the world have army and weapons. The nominator is also a cyclist, a cat lover, and so what? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think anyone here would vote in admiration of this. There can also be a "wow" in the very accuracy of an image. There is a language barrier here in thinking that "wow" is only defined in a positive way. There can also be "wow" for the skill off the photographer to capture something difficult very accurately. "Wow" is the ability for a photo to evoke emotion (good or bad) in the viewer. --Cart (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You misunderstand the meaning of Wow Cart. Unwise for a Swede to lecture a Tunisian. I agree with what El Golli Mohamed wrote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't speaking about "wow" according to Encyclopædia Britannica, but as used in the FPC guidelines as quoted by Basile earlier in this discussion. For years now, we've abridged that long sentence into the short word "wow". Whatever nationality we have, we are all WikiMedians. Right? --Cart (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose While there is merit in having disturbing images on Commons, I see no reason to feature this image. BTW, the claims made in the caption of the image are not verifiable by Wikimedians and may be false. --Tagooty (talk) 02:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chinese tuin Het Verborgen Rijk van Ming in de Hortus Haren. 19-05-2024. (d.j.b) 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 04:33:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waterfall. Location, Chinese garden, the Hidden Realm of Ming in the Hortus Haren in the Netherlands
 Comment Something like that in note, i think it is better. --Mile (talk) 07:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rougequeue de Moussier Parc national de Bou Kornine 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 22:22:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moussier's Redstart (Phoenicurus moussieri) at Boukornine NP

File:Guépier d'Europe ichkeul128.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 21:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European Bee-eater (Merops apiaster) at Ichkeul NP

File:Baumpilz nahe Krimmerswörthsee südlich von Zeil am Main.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 17:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hemipholiota populnea at "Krimmerswörthsee" lake

File:Pez payaso común (Amphiprion ocellaris) en una anémona magnífica (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 08.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 20:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ocellaris clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Philippines.

File:Red-tailed Laughingthrush 0A2A2723.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 19:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-tailed Laughingthrush

File:Carrie Nation by White Studio.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 17:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Carrie Nation

File:Цветущий урюк.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apricot in flowers backtopped by mountains. Ile-Alatau national park, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan.
  • Suggested version @Красный, The Cosmonaut, and C messier: Dear reviewers, I have reduced the slight halo in the treetop and then adjusted the overall tonal correction accordingly. If you like the result, you can use this edit for an update. Please see the SwissTransfer link. While editing, I realized that the glow in the treetop might have been due to some overly well-intentioned post-processing. But that's just my guess. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greater blue-eared starling (Lamprotornis chalybaeus nordmanni) Kruger.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:17:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Greater blue-eared starling (Lamprotornis chalybaeus nordmanni)

File:Άγιος Μηνάς, Φηρά 0069.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Agios Menas, Fira, Santorini

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore,1858) - Pale Wanderer.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore,1858) - Pale Wanderer.

File:Oeste do Faial.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 03:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

West Faial
If you practice levitation, I would suggest to choose a special moment of the day like golden hour or sunrise :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Train de maintenance des voies de chemin de fer - Metlaoui - Tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:52:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Support: much better --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sphingonotus sp - Haddej - tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 14:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
The info and reference have been added to the description on the file page. It's up to Ermell to perhaps add the "as of 2009" to the file name when the nom is done. --Cart (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Look at it from the bright side: The new clock face is there to be photographed any day now, this historic face can't be photographed again. Do you call a photo of Manhattan with the Twin Towers outdated or an historical documentation that we are lucky to have? --Cart (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 23:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Horology

File:Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 12:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Building at Domplatz 11 in Sankt Pölten, Lower Austria, Austria

File:Rosy garlic Radès beach.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 07:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rosy garlic Radès beach

File:Gephan Bhaga Gemur Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 00182.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 05:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gephan range towering above the Bhaga river, Lahaul, India
Minor change. I don't see much improvement, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met (73879).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 01:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Camp: Notes on Fashion exhibit at The Met

File:Faial Caldera panorama3.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 00:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Faial Caldera

File:Violet-backed starling (Cinnyricinclus leucogaster verreauxi) female.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 22:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cinnyricinclus leucogaster verreauxi (Violet-backed starling) female, Damaraland, Namibia

File:Пик Талгар заповедник.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 14:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Plain field with scrubs and different levels of mountains behind, backtopped by Talgar peak. Almaty Region, Kazakhstan.

File:Pisa - Cattedrale da Battistero 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 06:36:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Snowflake moray (Echidna nebulosa), Anilao, Philippines
  • I have applied a slight crop to the right bottom corner, so that what I believe is a feather star (black thing), is not on the way. Even if that could be an improvement, I don't see what is wrong with the crop, morays live in holes and rarely go out during the day as they are nocturnal predators. I also have to say that this animal is rare, and probably that's the reason why we have no FPs of the whole genus. That conditions to take pictures under water are more challenging than over the water is something that I don't need to elaborate, I guess. --Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have little doubt after reading the same words I used "Infortunate (sic) crop" in my review. That's an statement that doesn't speak for the reviewer. Again, we have no FP of the genus Echidna, but we have already 4 FPs of the species (not genus) Himantopus himantopus. I've definitely supported more images that I've opposed of El Golli Mohamed, so I have no personal issue here and no problem with the photographer, let alone free-license photographers. If I'm convinced, I support the image if not, I oppose, that has nothing to do with whom is behind the camera and in most of the cases people believe that and are thankful for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear reviewers, normally I am not a fan of repeating old mistakes, but regarding the incident mentioned here again, I would like to refer to the recent discussion from late May/early June. I agree with Poco a poco that we should please focus only on the images and not on the photographer behind the camera. Only through constructive discourse can we work together in a meaningful and healthy way. Behind every username there is a person who has to be respected, no matter if we have a different opinion or not. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Thu 27 Jun → Tue 02 Jul
Fri 28 Jun → Wed 03 Jul
Sat 29 Jun → Thu 04 Jul
Sun 30 Jun → Fri 05 Jul
Mon 01 Jul → Sat 06 Jul
Tue 02 Jul → Sun 07 Jul

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Sun 23 Jun → Tue 02 Jul
Mon 24 Jun → Wed 03 Jul
Tue 25 Jun → Thu 04 Jul
Wed 26 Jun → Fri 05 Jul
Thu 27 Jun → Sat 06 Jul
Fri 28 Jun → Sun 07 Jul
Sat 29 Jun → Mon 08 Jul
Sun 30 Jun → Tue 09 Jul
Mon 01 Jul → Wed 10 Jul
Tue 02 Jul → Thu 11 Jul

The bot

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2024.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=884719385"